Knowing, Knowing Perspicuously, and Knowing How One Knows
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract In Knowing and Seeing , Michael Ayers presents a view of what he calls primary knowledge according to which one who knows in that way both perspicuously how they know. Here, I use some general considerations about seeing, knowing, knowing order raise questions this view. More specifically, consider putative limits on one’s capacity know knows. The main question pursue concerns whether perspicuity should be thought either (i) as condition sensory experience, (ii) sense-based cognition, or (iii) an interface condition, involving interrelations between experience cognition.
منابع مشابه
Knowing How vs . Knowing That
More than forty years after Gilbert Ryle published his paper on "Knowing How and Knowing That" in 1945, 1 the problem of practical knowledge has still failed to establish for itself a secure position in the field of problems dealt with by analytic philosophers. Thus even today it can safely be asserted that it is discursive or theoretical knowledge, knowledge linguistically expressed, above all...
متن کاملAvicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows
It is a commonplace in the history of philosophy that issues surrounding selfawareness, consciousness, and self-knowledge do not become prominent until the early modern period. For medieval philosophers, particularly those in the Aristotelian tradition, the nature of self-knowledge plays only an ancillary role in psychology and epistemology. This is a natural consequence of Aristotle’s characte...
متن کاملKnowing how and knowing that : a tale of two ontologies
Outdoor education has traditionally dealt with sources of knowledge that originate within the experience itself. This situated source exists in tension with more traditional modes of institutionalized learning which emphasize knowledge as an objectified curriculum content. Two types of knowing emerge: one reflected in a more practical knowing how, the other in a more theoretical knowing that. T...
متن کاملTestimony and Knowing How
Much of what we learn from talking and listening does not qualify as testimonial knowledge: we can learn a great deal from other people without simply accepting what they say as true. In this article, I examine the ways in which we acquire skills or knowledge how from our interactions with other people, and I discuss whether there is a useful notion of testimonial knowledge how.
متن کاملStrategically knowing how
In this paper, we propose a single-agent logic of goal-directed knowing how extending the standard epistemic logic of knowing that with a new knowing how operator. The semantics of the new operator is based on the idea that knowing how to achieve φ means that there exists a (uniform) strategy such that the agent knows that it can make sure φ. We give an intuitive axiomatization of our logic and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Grazer Philosophische Studien
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0165-9227', '1875-6735']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-00000145